If you've seen me talk or read many of my various musings online, you know that I champion what I consider three of the most important things in business operations and effectiveness, the 3Cs:
I've spoken at length about how if we keep a pulse check on these three things, it will greatly help everything else run smoothly, but what I haven't specifically touched on is how the way we do this needs to evolve as we scale.
Let's break these down, and dive into each one:
When you're small
Communication in a startup or small operation tends to be organic and informal. Teams often work closely together, allowing for frequent face-to-face interactions and spontaneous discussions. You might all work in a single small room or two, allowing for frequent interaction, banter, and easy friendships to form. This environment can foster a strong sense of camaraderie and transparency, with everyone being on the same page about goals and tasks. It's possible to be more reactive at this size without it feeling overwhelming.
When you're small, communication can often feel easy. You may not even think about it; it just happens. You can notice people problems faster than a larger org can and hash them out faster, too. Complications can arise if you're mostly remote, but for the most part, it's still easy to reach out and resolve something.
When you're big
As your business grows, communication becomes more structured and layered. Departments and teams form, leading to increased specialization and potentially siloed communication. Clear channels such as email, meetings, and company-wide updates become essential to ensure information flows efficiently across the organization.
I talk to a lot of folks at larger organizations that say communication is difficult. There's too little or too much, rarely in the right places or with the right people. If the organization scaled quickly there's also a lot of strange feelings about this, too. Folks who used to feel close suddenly feel disconnected and like that culture has changed. If teams are still incredibly reactive at this size they easily get overwhelmed and burnt out. It's harder to notice patterns forming in people problems quickly or to address them en masse.
As you scale
Scaling amplifies the importance of proactive and intentional communication. With more moving parts and stakeholders involved, it's crucial to establish clear communication protocols and platforms. Implementing tools like project management software, internal wikis, and collaboration platforms sooner rather than later can streamline communication and ensure that everyone has access to the information they need. On the other hand, if these repositories themselves scale too quickly it can also lead to confusion.
Things that help
The biggest things that have helped me in organizations as we've scaled, or that I've used to coach others through scale, are the need to be proactive, intentional, and focused on value. What does that actually mean?
Being proactive with communication
In a scaling organization, being proactive with communication is like laying down tracks before the train arrives. It involves anticipating the needs of your team and stakeholders before they arise and preemptively addressing them. This can mean setting up regular check-ins, circulating updates on projects or initiatives, and actively seeking feedback to identify potential issues before they escalate.
Proactive communication also involves staying ahead of changes within the organization. As you scale, roles may evolve, new teams may form, and priorities may shift. Keeping everyone informed about these changes in advance helps maintain transparency and ensures that everyone is aligned with the organization's direction. Changes to roles, teams, and how and where information is stored or shared are even more important to make sure everyone is on the same page about because they can cause cascading communication issues if not.
Additionally, proactivity in communication means actively seeking opportunities to celebrate successes and milestones. Recognizing and acknowledging the achievements of individuals and teams fosters a positive culture and boosts morale, which is crucial for maintaining momentum during periods of growth.
Communicating intentionally
Intentionality in communication means being deliberate and purposeful in your interactions. It's about communicating clearly and precisely to ensure that your message is understood and aligns with your objectives.
As organizations scale, communication channels can become cluttered with noise, making it easy for important messages to get lost in the shuffle. Intentional communication involves cutting through the noise and delivering messages in a way that resonates with your audience. It also involves knowing when there's becoming too much noise and cutting back.
This may involve tailoring your communication style to suit the preferences and needs of different stakeholders, whether it's providing detailed reports for analytical minds or delivering concise summaries for busy executives.
Intentional communication also means actively listening to feedback and adapting your approach accordingly. It's not just about broadcasting messages but also creating opportunities for dialogue and collaboration.
Staying focused on value
As organizations scale, communication can become fragmented, with various teams and departments operating in silos. Focusing on value means ensuring that every communication adds meaningful value to the recipient. We have to avoid blasting folks from every direction with every little update. The things we share should hold value!
This requires a deep understanding of your audience's needs and priorities. Instead of inundating them with information overload, focus on delivering insights, updates, or resources that are relevant and actionable. A helpful tip is to consider "if the folks I am about to share this with were actually our customers would this message hold value?"
Value-focused communication also involves prioritizing clarity and brevity. In a fast-paced environment, people don't have time to sift through lengthy emails or presentations. Get to the point quickly and highlight the key takeaways upfront. This goes triple if it's customer-facing. Get. To. The. Point.
Moreover, emphasizing the value of communication encourages accountability and ownership. When team members understand the impact of their communication efforts, they are more likely to invest time and effort into crafting messages that resonate and drive results.
I try to encourage teams to communicate with me far less about what they did and far more about why they did it and the impact they think it will have.
Communicating with value also means communicating the value you want to receive. We must become much clearer with teams and individuals at scale about our expectations. What are the outcomes we want them to chase? What's our strategy, and how do we see them playing a pivotal role in it? What actions do we need from them right now, next, and later?
When you're small
In a small operation, collaboration happens naturally as team members often wear multiple hats and work closely together towards common objectives. Informal brainstorming sessions and ad-hoc collaborations are common, allowing for agility and quick decision-making. Collaboration also may not happen because there are only a few of you, and you're scrappy, with everyone trying to get something done quickly.
When you're big
As the organization grows, collaboration becomes more structured and deliberate. Cross-functional teams and project groups may be formed to tackle specific initiatives, requiring coordination across departments. Tools like shared document repositories and project management software have become essential for managing collaboration at scale.
If your scrappy mentality evolves in unhealthy ways, integral folks may be left out of key initiatives, decreasing their quality or causing them to take longer than they should have, whether in the initial first pass or all of the re-work that needs to happen after the fact to then get it right.
As you scale
Scaling requires shifting towards more formalized collaboration processes to ensure alignment and efficiency. Alignment on what? The outcome you're chasing, first and foremost, only then the path and efficiency of getting there. Establishing clear roles and responsibilities within teams, defining workflows, and implementing collaboration frameworks such as Agile or Scrum can help manage complexity and drive productivity. Notice my italics there, though– they can help, but you need to make sure folks understand their principles, how to implement them meaningfully, and more importantly, when not to. So many folks implement these tools and frameworks incorrectly, miss the point they originally were made to serve, or don't know when to let go.
One of the most common things I notice about organizations that scale quickly is that the folks who wore a lot of hats previously may suddenly feel FOMO (fear of missing out). They get involved when there are now specialists to take care of things, and this can easily cause a "too many cooks in the kitchen" type of feeling to form. When this happens, we have to ensure people are aligned on their roles and accountabilities and make sure leaders hire and train others and empower them rather than continuing to get involved themselves.
I like to remind folks of two of my favourite acronyms:
You don't want to swing a MISS or you'll wind up seeing SPOTS.
The point that these are getting at is that some initiatives and projects are meant to be worked on together. They're either better, quality-wise, or the act of making them together is half the point. Every time I hear about an organization hiring an external agency to make journey maps or service blueprints for them I can't help but laugh, because the act of making those things as a team is half the point. They help you build empathy together. This applies to almost any strategic plan or initiative– it's almost never a good idea to form alone.
Things that help
I think it's important to teach people that effective collaboration requires humility, contribution over competition, empathy, and gratitude.
When you're small
In a small operation, coordination often happens organically as team members are closely interconnected and aware of each other's activities. Communication is fluid, and decisions can be made quickly based on shared understanding and alignment.
When you're big
Coordination becomes more complex in a larger organization due to increased specialization and the need to manage interdependencies between teams and departments. What gets handed off to whom and why can be very confusing. Project managers or coordinators may be appointed to oversee large-scale initiatives and ensure that timelines and resources are managed effectively, though many of us ops professionals argue that if our attention were on efficiency and maturity, the teams may have been able to handle that themselves.
As you scale
Scaling requires a more systematic approach to coordination to prevent bottlenecks and ensure that activities align with overall business objectives. Establishing clear processes, workflows, and escalation paths can help streamline coordination and resolve conflicts efficiently. Creating good feedback loops between teams you need to provide to and consume from is incredibly important in service organizations so that you can quickly adapt to customer and partner changes.
Things that help
As you begin to compare and contrast common differences between smaller organizations, larger ones, or those that are in the middle of scaling, you may start to pick out what's true or not for your organization. Not everything I've outlined here is going to match up for you, as there will always be unique contexts. Either way, there will be major differences between when you're small and when you're big, and not every organization makes it through the growing pains in between. A lot of the why for that, I think, comes down to a lack of humility, lack of perspective and empathy, and an inability to make hard decisions quickly.
As we scale, we need to constantly be tuning our microscope to different levels, staying in touch with what the odd organism that is our organization is has evolved into. We need to do this at both an organizational level and a personal level. The people, processes, tools and other operational and cultural aspects of our business may cause some folks to thrive at one stage and stagnate or flounder at another. This doesn't mean we have to say goodbye to people who are having trouble with change, instead, to me it usually means we need to dig in and help inspire growth and maturity, and facilitate those awkward adjustments in communication, collaboration, and coordination.